Warren v. Commissioner

282 F.3d 1099
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 2002
DocketNos. 00-71217, 14924-98
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 F.3d 1099 (Warren v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Commissioner, 282 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2002).

Opinions

ORDER

TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

This Court hereby appoints Professor Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of [1120]*1120Southern California Law School to serve as amicus curiae and requests that the parties and amici submit supplemental briefs on the following issues:

(1) Does the Court have the authority to consider the constitutionality of IRC § 107(2)? Cf. Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 441 n. 7, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000); United States Nat’l Bank v. Indep. Ins. Agents, 508 U.S. 439, 447-48, 113 S.Ct. 2173, 124 L.Ed.2d 402 (1993); Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assoc., 485 U.S. 439, 445-47, 108 S.Ct. 1319, 99 L.Ed.2d 534 (1988).
(2) If so, should the Court exercise that authority?
(3) Is section 107(2) constitutional under the Establishment Clause? Cf. Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1, 109 S.Ct. 890, 103 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989).

The supplemental briefs shall be submitted within 45 days f the date of this order and shall be limited to 10,000 words. Reply briefs of not more than 5,000 words may be submitted within 21 days of the due date of the supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Pacific Railroad v. Coast Packing Co.
236 F. Supp. 2d 1130 (C.D. California, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 F.3d 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-commissioner-ca9-2002.