Warren v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

241 A.D. 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The finding of the jury that the representatives of the defendant had authority to make the contract on which the judgment is based is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. The burden rested upon the plaintiff to establish the agency. There was also error in admitting in evidence statements of the representatives of the defendant as proof of the scope of their agency. Thompson, J., votes for reversal also on the ground that there was no contract of settlement entered into between the plaintiff and the representatives of the defendant. All concur for reversal and a new trial except Crosby and Lewis, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. Commercial Casualty Insurance, 241 A.D. 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 913 (Warren v. Commercial Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michaels v. Agricultural Insurance
345 N.E.2d 341 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Michaels v. Agricultural Insurance
45 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)