Warren v. City of Gloversville

81 A.D. 291, 80 N.Y.S. 912
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 81 A.D. 291 (Warren v. City of Gloversville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. City of Gloversville, 81 A.D. 291, 80 N.Y.S. 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

Chase, J.:

An equity court is not bound to issue an injunction when it will produce great public or private mischief merely for the purpose of protecting a technical or unsubstantial right. (Gray v. Man. R. Co., 128 N. Y. 509; Garvey v. Long Island R. R. Co., 159 id. 323.)

When, however, the damages are substantial, the fact that an injunction would interfere with great industries, the development of natural resources, or with the plans of a great city for drainage, is not a sufficient reason for relaxing the ordinary rules governing the rights of riparian owners of land. (Strobel v. Kerr Salt Co., 164 27. Y. 303.)

Where wrongful interference with the waters of a stream causes substantial injury, an injunction to the person so substantially injured is a matter of right. (Sammons v. City of Gloversville, 34 Misc. Rep. 459, and cases cited; affd. in this court, 67 App. Div. 628.)

The rule in regard to lands bounded on a non-navigable stream applies also to lands bounded upon artificial watercourses, as a canal, a ditch or such like. In either case the presumption is that the adjoining landowner has title to the center of the stream, but this presumption may be rebutted by evidence. (4 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law [2d ed.], 832; 5 Cyc. 900.)

The trial court was in error in holding as a conclusion of law that upon the facts found by it the plaintiff was not a riparian owner nor [294]*294entitled to injunctive relief. The plaintiff’s damage being substantial, the judgment so far as it denies an injunction to the plaintiff should be reversed, with costs to the appellant, and an injunction should be granted to the same effect and containing the same provisions as in the case of Sammons v. City of Gloversville (34 Misc. Rep. 459),

All concurred.

Judgment so far as it denies injunction to the plaintiff reversed, with costs to appellant, and injunction granted to the same effect and containing the same provisions, as in the case of Sammons v. City of Gloversville (as reported in 34 Misc. Rep. 459).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thornhill v. Skidmore
32 Misc. 2d 320 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Stebbins v. Frisbie & Stansfield Knitting Co.
201 A.D. 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Whalen v. Union Bag & Paper Co.
145 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Warren v. Parkhurst
105 A.D. 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Warren v. Parkhurst
45 Misc. 466 (New York Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D. 291, 80 N.Y.S. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-city-of-gloversville-nyappdiv-1903.