Warren v. Chase
This text of 8 Misc. 520 (Warren v. Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decisions are uniform that disbursements as allowed by law were always allowed by law as costs to the party entitled' to recover costs.
They cannot, as in this case, exceed the damages. Code Civ. Proc. § 3228, subd. 3.
We are clear that the justice erred in allowing the insertion of the disbursements in this case.
The plaintiff, having recovered six cents damages, was only entitled to six cents costs, no matter what might be his disbursements.
The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, and the clerk’s taxation reinstated and affirmed.
Ehrlich, Ch. J., and Van Wyck, J., concur.
Order reversed and the clerk’s taxation reinstated and affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Misc. 520, 28 N.Y.S. 765, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-chase-nynyccityct-1894.