Warren v. Campbell

1 How. Pr. 60
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1844·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Defendant objects on the grounds that it is too late after testimony has been taken, and alleges actions of this kind should be put upon the same ground, as to amendments, as penal actions, where it is not done except under very special circumstances. Graham’s Practice 654, and cases there cited.

Plaintiff’s papers show that the newly discovered evidence has no bearing upon defendant’s testimony taken by commission, and the application was not induced by that.-

Decision.—Motion granted on payment of costs opposing motion and the costs of a new commission, if one shall become necessary, and the costs of the plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. Campbell, 1 How. Pr. 60 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

1 How. Pr. 60 (Warren v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Union Bank v. Mott
11 Abb. Pr. 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)