Warren v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.

72 S.E. 481, 156 N.C. 591, 1911 N.C. LEXIS 228
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 1, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 S.E. 481 (Warren v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warren v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co., 72 S.E. 481, 156 N.C. 591, 1911 N.C. LEXIS 228 (N.C. 1911).

Opinion

Pee CubiaM.

This is an action for personal injury, heard upon demurrer at April Term, 1911. The demurrer was overruled, and defendant excepted and appealed. It was admitted upon the argument in this Court that when the demurrer was *592 overruled the plaintiff asked and obtained permission to file an amended complaint. The demurrer was interposed to the original complaint. We cannot pass upon the demurrer to the original complaint, as it is superseded by the new complaint.

'When the plaintiff by permission filed an amended complaint at the time when the demurrer was overruled, the defendant should have either demurred or answered to the new complaint. As this amended complaint is not in the record we cannot tell whether it states a cause of action or not. It may allege very different facts from the first complaint. The defendant will be allowed to demur or answer the amended complaint.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warren v. . Susman
84 S.E. 760 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 S.E. 481, 156 N.C. 591, 1911 N.C. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-atlantic-yadkin-railway-co-nc-1911.