Warren v. AppleOne, Inc.
This text of Warren v. AppleOne, Inc. (Warren v. AppleOne, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 * * *
4 ALLANNA WARREN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01370-CDS-EJY
5 Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 v.
7 APPLEONE INC., HOWROYD-WRIGHT EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, INC., 8 Defendants. 9 10 This action commenced when Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and is not incarcerated, 11 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) together with a Civil Rights Complaint on 12 September 3, 2023. ECF No. 1, 1-1. The Court issued an Order on September 6, 2023, granting 13 Plaintiff’s IFP and dismissing her Complaint without prejudice but with leave to amend no later than 14 October 10, 2023. ECF No. 5. On September 11, 2023, Plaintiff appealed the Court’s Order to the 15 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which the Ninth Circuit dismissed on October 20, 2023. ECF Nos. 16 8, 14. Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint on October 2, 2023. ECF No. 12. 17 On December 9, 2024, the Court issued an Order dismissing Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 18 without prejudice with leave to file a second amended complaint no later than January 10, 2025. 19 ECF No. 17. In the same Order, the Court recommended Plaintiff’s claim alleging a violation of 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed with prejudice as no such claim exists as a matter of law. Id. at 5. On 21 December 12, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second appeal with the Ninth Circuit arising from the Court’s 22 December 9, 2024 Order. ECF No. 18. On January 16, 2025, the District Judge adopted the 23 December 9, 2024 recommendation in its entirety. ECF No. 22. On January 22, 2025, the Ninth 24 Circuit dismissed Plaintiff’s second appeal. ECF No. 23. Prompted by this dismissal, the Court 25 extended the deadline for Plaintiff to file her second amended complaint to February 7, 2025. ECF 26 No. 24. Plaintiff subsequently requested a two week extension of time, which the Court granted, 27 giving Plaintiff through February 25, 2025 to file her second amended complaint. ECF Nos. 25, 26. 1 To date Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint; nor has she otherwise 2 communicated with the Court. 3 Accordingly, and based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this matter 4 be dismissed in its entirety without prejudice but without leave to amend. 5 Dated this 6th day of March, 2025. 6
7 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 NOTICE 11 Under Local Rule IB 3-2, any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be in 12 writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days. The Supreme Court holds 13 the courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections 14 within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). The Ninth Circuit also held 15 that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and 16 brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order and/or appeal 17 factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 18 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Warren v. AppleOne, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-appleone-inc-nvd-2025.