Warren Tyron Calhoun v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 2018·No. 05-18-00062-CR·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed January 26, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00062-CR No. 05-18-00063-CR WARREN TYRON CALHOUN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-52259-N & F15-52260-N

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore Warren Tyron Calhoun appeals his convictions for possession of four grams or more but

less than 200 grams of cocaine and four grams or more but less than 200 grams of phencyclidine.

On July 23, 2015, appellant pleaded guilty to both offenses pursuant to a plea bargain with the

State, and the trial court placed appellant on deferred adjudication for nine years. The State later

filed a motion to proceed with an adjudication of guilt in each case. On March 3, 2017, after

appellant entered pleas of true to the State’s allegations of violations of his community supervision,

the trial court found him guilty of each offense and assessed punishment at twenty-five years in

prison in each case. Appellant filed notices of appeal in the trial court on May 12, 2017; those

notices were forwarded to this Court on January 19, 2018. In a criminal case where no motion for new trial has been filed, an appellant invokes the

jurisdiction of this Court by filing a written notice of appeal within thirty days after the date

sentence was imposed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). The appellate court may grant an extension

to file a notice of appeal if, within fifteen days after the due date for the notice of appeal, the

prospective appellant files in the trial court a written notice of appeal and files in the appellate

court a motion to extend the time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(2), 26.3.

Absent a timely notice of appeal or a timely request for extension, this Court does not have

jurisdiction over the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)

(per curiam); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Here, appellant’s sentences were imposed on March 3, 2017. Appellant did not file timely

motions for new trial; thus, his notices of appeal were due on April 2, 2017. Because he filed his

notices of appeal on May 12, 2017, we lack jurisdiction over these appeals.

We dismiss these appeals.

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

180062F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

WARREN TYRON CALHOUN, Appellant On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. No. 05-18-00062-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-52259-N. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 26th day of January, 2018.

–3– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

WARREN TYRON CALHOUN, Appellant On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. No. 05-18-00063-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-52260-N. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

–4–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren Tyron Calhoun v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Warren Tyron Calhoun v. State (Warren Tyron Calhoun v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)