Warren L. Holderman v. Carolyn H. McCullers Jack H. Brown, and David Hill

Fourth Circuit

Warren L. Holderman v. Carolyn H. McCullers Jack H. Brown, and David Hill

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17422, 1995 WL 298105

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 1995·No. 94-6703·Published

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Warren L. HOLDERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carolyn H. McCULLERS; Jack H. Brown, Defendants-Appellees,
and
David HILL, Defendant.

No. 94-6703.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 31, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.

Warren L. Holderman, Appellant Pro Se. LaVee Hamer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holderman v. McCullers, No. CA-93-95 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 1993; June 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Warren L. HOLDERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carolyn H. McCULLERS; Jack H. Brown, Defendants-Appellees,
and
David HILL, Defendant.

No. 94-6703.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 31, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.

Warren L. Holderman, Appellant Pro Se. LaVee Hamer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holderman v. McCullers, No. CA-93-95 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 1993; June 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Warren L. Holderman v. Carolyn H. McCullers Jack H. Brown, and David Hill, 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17422, 1995 WL 298105 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

54 F.3d 773 (Warren L. Holderman v. Carolyn H. McCullers Jack H. Brown, and David Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.