Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida
This text of Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida (Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D20-890 _____________________________
WARREN K. MARTIN,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
September 30, 2020
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that “[t]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850”); Mills v. Dugger, 574 So. 2d 63, 65 (Fla. 1990) (“As we have stated numerous times, habeas corpus is not to be used for obtaining additional appeals of issues which were raised, or should have been raised, on direct appeal or which were waived at trial or which could have, should have, or have been, raised in prior postconviction filings.” (internal marks omitted)).
RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Warren K. Martin, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-k-martin-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.