Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 2020·No. 20-0890·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D20-890

WARREN K. MARTIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 30, 2020

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that “[t]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850”); Mills v. Dugger, 574 So. 2d 63, 65 (Fla. 1990) (“As we have stated numerous times, habeas corpus is not to be used for obtaining additional appeals of issues which were raised, or should have been raised, on direct appeal or which were waived at trial or which could have, should have, or have been, raised in prior postconviction filings.” (internal marks omitted)).

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Warren K. Martin, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida (Warren K. Martin v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Mills v. Dugger
574 So. 2d 63 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)