Warren H. Corning and Maud E. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Warren H. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 239 F.2d 646 (Warren H. Corning and Maud E. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Warren H. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
239 F.2d 646
57-1 USTC P 9214
Warren H. CORNING and Maud E. Corning, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Warren H. CORNING, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Nos. 12778, 12779.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 1, 1956.
Barring Coughlin and David A. Gaskill, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.
Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, Lee A. Jackson and Loring W. Post, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record and the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, the Court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision herein reviewed be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of the Tax Court. 24 T.C. 907.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 F.2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-h-corning-and-maud-e-corning-v-commissioner-ca6-1956.