Warren H. Corning and Maud E. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Warren H. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

239 F.2d 646
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 1, 1956·No. 12779·Published

Opinion

239 F.2d 646

57-1 USTC P 9214

Warren H. CORNING and Maud E. Corning, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Warren H. CORNING, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. 12778, 12779.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 1, 1956.

Barring Coughlin and David A. Gaskill, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, Lee A. Jackson and Loring W. Post, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record and the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel, the Court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision herein reviewed be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of the Tax Court. 24 T.C. 907.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren H. Corning and Maud E. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Warren H. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 239 F.2d 646 (6th Cir. 1956).

239 F.2d 646 (Warren H. Corning and Maud E. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Warren H. Corning v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corning v. Commissioner
24 T.C. 907 (U.S. Tax Court, 1955)