Warren Galloway and Earl James Mays v. City of Columbus, Mississippi

Fifth Circuit

Warren Galloway and Earl James Mays v. City of Columbus, Mississippi

353 F.2d 214, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3859

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 24, 1965

Docket22935

StatusPublished

This text of 353 F.2d 214 (Warren Galloway and Earl James Mays v. City of Columbus, Mississippi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren Galloway and Earl James Mays v. City of Columbus, Mississippi, 353 F.2d 214, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3859 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of appellants’ suggestion for summary reversal to which appellee has filed no response, although *215 notified of such suggestion for summary reversal, and it appearing that the decision of the District Court was rendered prior to the decisions of this Court in Peacock v. City of Greenwood, (5 Cir. 1965) 347 F.2d 679; and McNair, et al. v. City of Drew, Mississippi, (5 Cir.1965) 351 F.2d 498 (September 28, 1965), it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is vacated and reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for further consistent proceedings, which proceedings will include such factual hearings as may be appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of appellants’ suggestion for summary reversal to which appellee has filed no response, although *215 notified of such suggestion for summary reversal, and it appearing that the decision of the District Court was rendered prior to the decisions of this Court in Peacock v. City of Greenwood, (5 Cir. 1965) 347 F.2d 679; and McNair, et al. v. City of Drew, Mississippi, (5 Cir.1965) 351 F.2d 498 (September 28, 1965), it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is vacated and reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for further consistent proceedings, which proceedings will include such factual hearings as may be appropriate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 F.2d 214, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-galloway-and-earl-james-mays-v-city-of-columbus-mississippi-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack