Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P./Gotham Insurance Company v. Gotham Insurance Company/Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P.
This text of Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P./Gotham Insurance Company v. Gotham Insurance Company/Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P. (Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P./Gotham Insurance Company v. Gotham Insurance Company/Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS WARREN E & P, INC., f/k/a § PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT No. 08-10-00198-CV CORPORATION d/b/a PEDECO, INC., § WARREN RESOURCES, INC., and OIL Appeal from the TECHNOLOGY FUND 1996 – SERIES § D, L. P., 81st District Court Appellants/Cross- § Appellees, of Frio County, Texas § v. (TC# 98-02-00039CVF) § GOTHAM INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Cross- Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to render judgment effectuating the
parties’ settlement agreement as permitted by TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, we
grant the motion and render judgment effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement. In
accordance with the parties’ agreement, trial and appellate costs are taxed against the party
incurring the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). The agreed motion for extension of time to
appoint mediator is denied as moot.
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice November 5, 2014
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ. Rivera, J., not participating
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P./Gotham Insurance Company v. Gotham Insurance Company/Warren E & P, Inc. F/K/A Petroleum Development Corporation D/B/A Pedeco, Inc. Warren Resources, Inc., and Oil Technology Fund 1996-Series D, L. P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-e-p-inc-fka-petroleum-development-corporation-dba-pedeco-texapp-2014.