Warren, D. v. MDJ
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DANIEL WARREN, : No. 54 MM 2019 :
Petitioner : : :
v. : : :
KAREN C. DEVINE, : :
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2019, the “Petition for Review in the
Nature of a Mandamus” is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name
of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warren, D. v. MDJ, (Pa. 2019).
Warren, D. v. MDJ (Warren, D. v. MDJ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.