Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser

Ohio Supreme Court

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser

693 N.E.2d 766, 82 Ohio St. 3d 8

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 13, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2639

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 693 N.E.2d 766 (Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser, 693 N.E.2d 766, 82 Ohio St. 3d 8 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We accept the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We note that on September 24, 1997, we indefinitely suspended respondent from the practice of law for different misconduct — respondent accepted retainers and then neglected the legal matters entrusted to him. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 683 N.E.2d 1148. Respondent’s continued pattern of neglect of client matters coupled with his failure to cooperate with relator in its investigation indicates that respondent will not conform to [10]*10the required ethical standards. Such conduct warrants disbarment. Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We accept the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We note that on September 24, 1997, we indefinitely suspended respondent from the practice of law for different misconduct — respondent accepted retainers and then neglected the legal matters entrusted to him. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 683 N.E.2d 1148. Respondent’s continued pattern of neglect of client matters coupled with his failure to cooperate with relator in its investigation indicates that respondent will not conform to [10]*10the required ethical standards. Such conduct warrants disbarment. Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 N.E.2d 766, 82 Ohio St. 3d 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-county-bar-assn-v-lieser-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack