Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser

693 N.E.2d 766, 82 Ohio St. 3d 8
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1998·No. No. 97-2639·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We accept the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We note that on September 24, 1997, we indefinitely suspended respondent from the practice of law for different misconduct — respondent accepted retainers and then neglected the legal matters entrusted to him. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 683 N.E.2d 1148. Respondent’s continued pattern of neglect of client matters coupled with his failure to cooperate with relator in its investigation indicates that respondent will not conform to [10]*10the required ethical standards. Such conduct warrants disbarment. Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser, 693 N.E.2d 766, 82 Ohio St. 3d 8 (Ohio 1998).

693 N.E.2d 766 (Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Meros
2000 Ohio 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Meros
731 N.E.2d 629 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser
1998 Ohio 361 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)