Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Douglas B. Wyatt, M.D. and Lynn Wyatt

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 27, 2003
Docket07-03-00265-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Douglas B. Wyatt, M.D. and Lynn Wyatt (Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Douglas B. Wyatt, M.D. and Lynn Wyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Douglas B. Wyatt, M.D. and Lynn Wyatt, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

WARRANTY UNDERWRITERS V. WYATT
NO. 07-03-0265-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


OCTOBER 27, 2003



______________________________


WARRANTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT


V.


DOUGLAS B. WYATT, M .D. AND LYNN WYATT, APPELLEES


_________________________________


FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;


NO. 51,914-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE


_______________________________


Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 7, 2003, appellant Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company filed an Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to agreement of the parties and in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion includes a certificate of conference and a certificate of service that counsel for appellees was served a copy of the motion by first class mail on October 6, 2003. No response to the motion has been received.

Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, appellant's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

All costs are assessed to the appellant. Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant's request and the appellees not having opposed such request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.



Don H. Reavis

Justice



re of his request for and refused same. This he did not do. Moreover, the same analysis applies to any motion pending before the trial court filed by Watson. He has failed to illustrate that any of his motions have been presented to the trial court or that the court has refused to rule.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.



Brian Quinn

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Douglas B. Wyatt, M.D. and Lynn Wyatt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warranty-underwriters-insurance-company-v-douglas--texapp-2003.