Warr v. Darlington County

186 S.E. 920, 181 S.C. 254, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 171
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 23, 1936·No. 14341·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

Plaintiffs brought their action to recover damages for the destruction of their crop of tobacco by a “mob of disorderly and riotous persons,’’ on the night of. July 10, 1935. They predicate their action upon the provisions of Section 1385 of the Code of 1932. To the complaint the defendant interposed a demurrer, which was sustained by the Circuit Judge, Dennis, and the complaint was dismissed by his order.

From this order plaintiffs appeal.

We are of opinion that the order of Judge Dennis, sustaining the demurrer, correctly disposes of the issues involved. It is accordingly affirmed.

Ret it be reported.

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabeer and Messrs. Justices Baker and FishburnE concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warr v. Darlington County, 186 S.E. 920, 181 S.C. 254, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 171 (S.C. 1936).

186 S.E. 920 (Warr v. Darlington County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Alls
500 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)