Warr v. Darlington County

186 S.E. 920, 181 S.C. 254, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 171
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 23, 1936
Docket14341
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 S.E. 920 (Warr v. Darlington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warr v. Darlington County, 186 S.E. 920, 181 S.C. 254, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 171 (S.C. 1936).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

Plaintiffs brought their action to recover damages for the destruction of their crop of tobacco by a “mob of disorderly and riotous persons,’’ on the night of. July 10, 1935. They predicate their action upon the provisions of Section 1385 of the Code of 1932. To the complaint the defendant interposed a demurrer, which was sustained by the Circuit Judge, Dennis, and the complaint was dismissed by his order.

From this order plaintiffs appeal.

We are of opinion that the order of Judge Dennis, sustaining the demurrer, correctly disposes of the issues involved. It is accordingly affirmed.

Ret it be reported.

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabeer and Messrs. Justices Baker and FishburnE concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Alls
500 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.E. 920, 181 S.C. 254, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warr-v-darlington-county-sc-1936.