Warnock v. City of Rochester
248 A.D. 675
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 675 (Warnock v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Warnock v. City of Rochester, 248 A.D. 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The first order denies motion for a temporary injunction in a taxpayer’s action to restrain awarding a contract. The second order makes defendant Gresens a party in the action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warnock-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1936.