Warnick v. State
This text of Warnick v. State (Warnick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DARRYL L. WARNICK, § § Defendant Below, § No. 453, 2018 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1203011242 (K) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: September 25, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018
Before VALIHURA, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s
motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the August 20, 2018
Superior Court order denying the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief
under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 should be affirmed. The Superior Court did
not err in concluding that the motion was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the
pleading requirements of Rule 61(d)(2).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED
and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Warnick v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warnick-v-state-del-2018.