Warner Woodard v. State
This text of Warner Woodard v. State (Warner Woodard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
__________________________________________________________________
WARNER WOODARD
, Appellant,THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
__________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Before Chief Justice Seerden, and Justices Hinojosa and Chavez
Appellant, WARNER WOODARD, attempted to perfect appeals from judgments entered by the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. Sentence in these causes was imposed on March 9, 2000. No timely motion for new trial was filed. The notices of appeal were due to be filed on April 8, 2000, but were not filed until September 21, 2000. Said notices of appeal are untimely filed.
Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notices of appeal and motion requesting an extension of time within such period.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeals, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 9th day of November, 2000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Warner Woodard v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-woodard-v-state-texapp-2000.