Warner v. Wood

Second Circuit

Warner v. Wood

200 F. 542, 118 C.C.A. 636, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1871

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 11, 1912

DocketNo. 80

StatusPublished

This text of 200 F. 542 (Warner v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warner v. Wood, 200 F. 542, 118 C.C.A. 636, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1871 (2d Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the reasoning and conclusion of the District Judge, and think it unnecessary further to discuss the case, except to say that we find in the pencil memorandum, signed by both parties on January 18, 1910, a corroboration so .strong of complainant’s assertions as to the terms of the original contract of January 17, 1910, that we should reach the same conclusion that Judge Hazel has, even if the memorandum of August 13, 1910, were out of the case.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the reasoning and conclusion of the District Judge, and think it unnecessary further to discuss the case, except to say that we find in the pencil memorandum, signed by both parties on January 18, 1910, a corroboration so .strong of complainant’s assertions as to the terms of the original contract of January 17, 1910, that we should reach the same conclusion that Judge Hazel has, even if the memorandum of August 13, 1910, were out of the case.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 F. 542, 118 C.C.A. 636, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-wood-ca2-1912.