Warner v. Whittaker
5 Mich. 241, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 39
This text of 5 Mich. 241 (Warner v. Whittaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Warner v. Whittaker, 5 Mich. 241, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 39 (Mich. 1858).
Opinion
We think it sufficient that the bond is executed on behalf of both appellants.
For another reason we should not be inclined to entertain this motion. The transcript on appeal was filed in August last, and two terms of Court have since elapsed without this motion being made. In such cases, the party must make his application at the earliest opportunity.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Spokane & Idaho Lumber Co. v. Loy
58 P. 672 (Washington Supreme Court, 1899)
Love v. Francis
29 N.W. 843 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Mich. 241, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-whittaker-mich-1858.