Warner v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board
This text of 188 F.2d 363 (Warner v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
188 F.2d 363
Thomas WARNER, Jr. and Jean Sprague, doing business under the fictitious firm name of Warner Welded Products, a limited partnership, Petitioner,
v.
WAR CONTRACTS PRICE ADJUSTMENT BOARD, Respondent.
No. 12764.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 13, 1951.
On Petition to Review Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
Manuel Ruiz, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Ernest A. Tolin, U. S. Atty., Walter S. Bins, Chief Asst. U. S. Atty., Clyde C. Downing and Arline Martin, Assts. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal. (Newell A. Clapp, Harland F. Leathers and John F. Wolf, Attorneys, Dept. of Justice, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.
Before STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges, and FEE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of War Contracts Price Adjustment Board to dismiss the appeal to this court and the petition for review of the determination of the Tax Court, 14 T.C. 1320, is granted. See French v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 9 Cir., 1950, 182 F.2d 560.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 F.2d 363, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-war-contracts-price-adjustment-board-ca9-1951.