Warner v. Tyson
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BENJAMIN WARNER § § No. 322, 2024
Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, § § Court Below: Court of Chancery of v. § the State of Delaware §
TIMOTHY C. TYSON, RICHARD § C.A. No. 2023-0159 CUNNINGHAM, CLIVE § KABATZNIK, VINCENT PALMIERI, § EDWARD ROFFMAN and § MICHAEL TAGLICH, § §
Individual Defendants-Below, § Appellees, § §
-and- § §
ICAGEN, INC. nka § IXC DISCOVERY, INC., § §
Nominal Defendant-Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: February 12, 2025 Decided: April 3, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.
ORDER
This 3rd day of April, 2025, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs
and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the
judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons stated in the Order Addressing Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss dated July
12, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warner v. Tyson (Warner v. Tyson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.