Warner v. Thurlo

15 Mass. 154
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 15, 1818
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 15 Mass. 154 (Warner v. Thurlo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warner v. Thurlo, 15 Mass. 154 (Mass. 1818).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was decided, in the case of Harris vs. Clap & Al., that, in a suit upon a bond, damages may be recovered beyond the penalty, so as not to exceed interest on the penalty from the commencement of the action. Further than that, no case decided in this commonwealth will be found to have gone; and by the latest decisions in England, it seems that nothing beyond the penalty can be recovered.

The surety in a bond may be supposed to know that he is responsible, to the amount of the penalty and the interest, provided a breach of the condition will amount to so much in damages; add he cannot complain of the legal consequences of his contract. But to extend his liability further, would be to make a contract for him to which he never assented,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John W. Egan Co. v. Major Construction Management Corp.
709 N.E.2d 66 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1999)
State v. American Surety Co. of New York
24 P.2d 267 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1933)
Harmon v. Weston
215 Mass. 242 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Rogers v. Abbot
92 N.E. 472 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
George H. Sampson Co. v. Commonwealth
88 N.E. 911 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Bassett v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
68 N.E. 205 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Bond v. Godsey
39 S.E. 216 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1901)
New Home Sewing MacHine Co. v. Seago
38 S.E. 805 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1901)
Clark v. Wilkinson
59 Wis. 543 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1884)
Wyman v. Robinson
73 Me. 384 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1882)
United States v. Meeker
26 F. Cas. 1234 (D. New Jersey, 1873)
President, Directors & Co. of Bank of Brighton v. Smith
94 Mass. 243 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1866)
Robbins v. Long
16 N.J. Eq. 59 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1863)
Lyon v. . Clark
8 N.Y. 148 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)
Stevens v. Owen
25 Me. 94 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1845)
Judge of Probate v. Heydock
8 N.H. 491 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1837)
Mower v. Kip
6 Paige Ch. 88 (New York Court of Chancery, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Mass. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-thurlo-mass-1818.