Warner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Warner v. State

488 So. 2d 860, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11500

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1986·No. No. 85-1166·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals convictions and sentences for sexual battery and armed robbery, both with a firearm. He contends that (1) a pretrial identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive, and (2) oral and written confessions were obtained by procedures which violated his constitutional rights. The trial court’s resolution of the factual disputes is clearly supported by the evidence. On the legal authority of Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972) and Wigfall v. State, 323 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), the convictions are

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals convictions and sentences for sexual battery and armed robbery, both with a firearm. He contends that (1) a pretrial identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive, and (2) oral and written confessions were obtained by procedures which violated his constitutional rights. The trial court’s resolution of the factual disputes is clearly supported by the evidence. On the legal authority of Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972) and Wigfall v. State, 323 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), the convictions are

Affirmed.

Warner v. State, 488 So. 2d 860, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11500 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

488 So. 2d 860 (Warner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related