Warner v. State
This text of 488 So. 2d 860 (Warner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals convictions and sentences for sexual battery and armed robbery, both with a firearm. He contends that (1) a pretrial identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive, and (2) oral and written confessions were obtained by procedures which violated his constitutional rights. The trial court’s resolution of the factual disputes is clearly supported by the evidence. On the legal authority of Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972) and Wigfall v. State, 323 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), the convictions are
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 So. 2d 860, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.