Warner v. North

1 Cow. 179
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1823
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Cow. 179 (Warner v. North) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warner v. North, 1 Cow. 179 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Opinion

Curia.

The mere fact of the discharge, without its production, is not notice to the plaintiff, or the Sheriff. If the plaintiff knows of its existence, and, notwithstanding, holds the defendant to bail, without a prev ious order, he would be punishable for the irregularity. But the proceedings of the plaintiff, in this instance, have arisen from the silence of the defendant; and he has misled the plaintiff still farther, by giving a bail bond to the Sheriff. lie ought to pay the costs which the plaintiff has incurred through this fault. Let the proceedings in the bail bond suit be set aside, on paying the costs of the suit, and of this application.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shipman v. Horton
17 Conn. 481 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cow. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-north-nysupct-1823.