Warner v. North

1 Cow. 179
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The mere fact of the discharge, without its production, is not notice to the plaintiff, or the Sheriff. If the plaintiff knows of its existence, and, notwithstanding, holds the defendant to bail, without a prev ious order, he would be punishable for the irregularity. But the proceedings of the plaintiff, in this instance, have arisen from the silence of the defendant; and he has misled the plaintiff still farther, by giving a bail bond to the Sheriff. lie ought to pay the costs which the plaintiff has incurred through this fault. Let the proceedings in the bail bond suit be set aside, on paying the costs of the suit, and of this application.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warner v. North, 1 Cow. 179 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

1 Cow. 179 (Warner v. North) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shipman v. Horton
17 Conn. 481 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1846)