Warner v. Kenan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warner v. Kenan

12 A.D.2d 727, 211 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 727 (Warner v. Kenan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warner v. Kenan, 12 A.D.2d 727, 211 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motions of plaintiffs granted to extent of modifying orders of this court dated June 29,1960 to provide [728]*728that typewritten records and briefs shall be filed and served on or before January 20, 1961. Cross motions by defendant denied. Memorandum: It appears from the affidavits of plaintiffs’ attorney that the motion made at Special Term pursuant to section 1493 of the Civil Practice Act was denied upon the ground that prior order of this court had directed that all papers be filed on or before August 10, 1960. The plaintiffs are relieved of this stricture so that the motion may be renewed before Special Term and decided upon the merits. We, of course, express no opinion upon the merits of such an application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motions of plaintiffs granted to extent of modifying orders of this court dated June 29,1960 to provide [728]*728that typewritten records and briefs shall be filed and served on or before January 20, 1961. Cross motions by defendant denied. Memorandum: It appears from the affidavits of plaintiffs’ attorney that the motion made at Special Term pursuant to section 1493 of the Civil Practice Act was denied upon the ground that prior order of this court had directed that all papers be filed on or before August 10, 1960. The plaintiffs are relieved of this stricture so that the motion may be renewed before Special Term and decided upon the merits. We, of course, express no opinion upon the merits of such an application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 727, 211 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-kenan-nyappdiv-1960.