Warner v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warner v. Holmes

115 A.D. 889, 100 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D. 889 (Warner v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warner v. Holmes, 115 A.D. 889, 100 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

This order for the taking of- deposition of a person-not a party cannot s.tand, for it was granted at Special Term instead of by a judge; the affidavits presented were insufficient in material matters, and the order itself is indefinite, if not defective. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This order for the taking of- deposition of a person-not a party cannot s.tand, for it was granted at Special Term instead of by a judge; the affidavits presented were insufficient in material matters, and the order itself is indefinite, if not defective. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D. 889, 100 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-holmes-nyappdiv-1906.