Warner v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warner v. Holmes

115 A.D. 889, 100 N.Y.S. 1148

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1906·Published

Opinion

This order for the taking of- deposition of a person-not a party cannot s.tand, for it was granted at Special Term instead of by a judge; the affidavits presented were insufficient in material matters, and the order itself is indefinite, if not defective. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This order for the taking of- deposition of a person-not a party cannot s.tand, for it was granted at Special Term instead of by a judge; the affidavits presented were insufficient in material matters, and the order itself is indefinite, if not defective. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.-

Warner v. Holmes, 115 A.D. 889, 100 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

115 A.D. 889 (Warner v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.