Warner v. Davis
166 A. 164, 110 N.J.L. 458, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 526
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Donges, Heher, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 12.
For reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warner v. Davis, 166 A. 164, 110 N.J.L. 458, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 526 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 164 (Warner v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. Globe Porcelain Co.
179 A.2d 11 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)