Warner Norcross & Judd LLP v. Police & Fire Retirement Systems
This text of Warner Norcross & Judd LLP v. Police & Fire Retirement Systems (Warner Norcross & Judd LLP v. Police & Fire Retirement Systems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 1, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 146702 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD, LLP, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 146702 COA: 312779 Wayne CC: 09-014899-CK RDD INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, ROMULUS DEEP DISPOSAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, REMUS JOINT VENTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC., RONALD ZAJAC, P.C., and F. LOGAN DAVIDSON, Defendants. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 1, 2013 _________________________________________ d0325 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Warner Norcross & Judd LLP v. Police & Fire Retirement Systems, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-norcross-judd-llp-v-police-fire-retirement--mich-2013.