Warner-Lambert Company v. Berta Soto, Individually and as Co-Independent of the Estate of Beatrice L. Herrera Beatrice Soto Leonel Herrera Rafael Herrera And Raul Herrera

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 4, 2004
Docket13-02-00240-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Warner-Lambert Company v. Berta Soto, Individually and as Co-Independent of the Estate of Beatrice L. Herrera Beatrice Soto Leonel Herrera Rafael Herrera And Raul Herrera (Warner-Lambert Company v. Berta Soto, Individually and as Co-Independent of the Estate of Beatrice L. Herrera Beatrice Soto Leonel Herrera Rafael Herrera And Raul Herrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warner-Lambert Company v. Berta Soto, Individually and as Co-Independent of the Estate of Beatrice L. Herrera Beatrice Soto Leonel Herrera Rafael Herrera And Raul Herrera, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-02-240-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY,                                         Appellant,


v.


BERTA SOTO, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL.,                                Appellees.

_________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-534-00-B. After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was submitted to the Court, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties state that they have reached an agreement to dismiss the appeal conditioned upon an order from this Court setting aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remanding the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreements.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and the parties’ joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The parties’ joint motion is granted. The judgment of the trial court is SET ASIDE, and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreements.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 4th day of November, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Warner-Lambert Company v. Berta Soto, Individually and as Co-Independent of the Estate of Beatrice L. Herrera Beatrice Soto Leonel Herrera Rafael Herrera And Raul Herrera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-lambert-company-v-berta-soto-individually-and-as-co-independent-of-texapp-2004.