Warn v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

57 N.E. 742, 163 N.Y. 525, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1096
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 22, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

This is not a unanimous affirmance. The cases of Harroun v.Brush El. Light Co. (152 N.Y. 212) *Page 527 and McDonnell v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. (159 N.Y. 524) are not in conflict with this decision. In the former case, the record recited four justices as sitting, and they all concurred; in the latter case, all the justices composing the court heard the argument, but one of them died before it was decided. In this case one of the sitting justices did not vote, although he had the right to do so.

The motion should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, VANN, LANDON and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warn v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co., 57 N.E. 742, 163 N.Y. 525, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1096 (N.Y. 1900).

57 N.E. 742 (Warn v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaughan v. . Transit Development Co.
118 N.E. 219 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
People ex rel. Mara v. Waldo
167 A.D. 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Wangner v. . Grimm
62 N.E. 569 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)