Warmuth v. New York State Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warmuth v. New York State Division

110 A.D.3d 1136, 972 N.Y.S.2d 925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 110 A.D.3d 1136 (Warmuth v. New York State Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warmuth v. New York State Division, 110 A.D.3d 1136, 972 N.Y.S.2d 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O’Connor, J.), entered April 18, 2013 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner is presently serving a prison sentence of 20 years to life as the result of his conviction for murder in the second degree. He reappeared before the Board of Parole in October 2011, at which time the Board denied his request for parole release and ordered him held for an additional 24 months. After he failed to receive a timely response to his administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

Respondent concedes, and we agree, that petitioner is entitled to a new parole hearing due to the Board’s failure to use an available “COMPAS Risk and Needs Assessment” instrument (see Matter of Garfield v Evans, 108 AD3d 830, 830-831 [2013]). We accordingly reverse and remit to the Board for further proceedings.

Peters, EJ., Stein, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, determination annulled and matter remitted to the Board of Parole for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O’Connor, J.), entered April 18, 2013 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner is presently serving a prison sentence of 20 years to life as the result of his conviction for murder in the second degree. He reappeared before the Board of Parole in October 2011, at which time the Board denied his request for parole release and ordered him held for an additional 24 months. After he failed to receive a timely response to his administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

Respondent concedes, and we agree, that petitioner is entitled to a new parole hearing due to the Board’s failure to use an available “COMPAS Risk and Needs Assessment” instrument (see Matter of Garfield v Evans, 108 AD3d 830, 830-831 [2013]). We accordingly reverse and remit to the Board for further proceedings.

Peters, EJ., Stein, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, determination annulled and matter remitted to the Board of Parole for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D.3d 1136, 972 N.Y.S.2d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warmuth-v-new-york-state-division-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack