Warmoth v. Durand

47 A. 1132, 61 N.J. Eq. 673, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 223
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 19, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 47 A. 1132 (Warmoth v. Durand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warmoth v. Durand, 47 A. 1132, 61 N.J. Eq. 673, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 223 (N.J. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery, who advised it.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Collins, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees—13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A. 1132, 61 N.J. Eq. 673, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warmoth-v-durand-nj-1900.