Warme v. City of New York
89 A.D.3d 548, 932 N.Y.2d 690
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 2011·Published
Opinion
Flaintiffs opening statement, or her proffer of proof thereafter failed to set forth a prima facie case of negligence against defendants (see Ortiz v City of New York, 39 AD3d 359, 359 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 803 [2007]).
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in refusing to recuse itself, as there was no showing of bias (Ronald S. v Lucille Diamond S., 45 AD3d 295, 297 [2007]). Concur— Andrias, J.E, Friedman, DeGrasse, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warme v. City of New York, 89 A.D.3d 548, 932 N.Y.2d 690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 548 (Warme v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ortiz v. City of New York
39 A.D.3d 359 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Ronald S. v. Lucille Diamond S.
45 A.D.3d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)