Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Warme v. City of New York

Warme v. City of New York

89 A.D.3d 548, 932 N.Y.2d 690
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.3d 548 (Warme v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warme v. City of New York, 89 A.D.3d 548, 932 N.Y.2d 690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Flaintiffs opening statement, or her proffer of proof thereafter failed to set forth a prima facie case of negligence against defendants (see Ortiz v City of New York, 39 AD3d 359, 359 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 803 [2007]).

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in refusing to recuse itself, as there was no showing of bias (Ronald S. v Lucille Diamond S., 45 AD3d 295, 297 [2007]). Concur— Andrias, J.E, Friedman, DeGrasse, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ortiz v. City of New York
39 A.D.3d 359 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Ronald S. v. Lucille Diamond S.
45 A.D.3d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 548, 932 N.Y.2d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warme-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2011.