Warman v. Philips

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2009·No. 09-7646·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7646

STEVEN E. WARMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WAYNE PHILIPS, Warden,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00217-IMK-JES)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven E. Warman, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven E. Warman, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Warman v. Philips, No. 1:08-cv-00217-

IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2009) We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warman v. Philips, (4th Cir. 2009).

Warman v. Philips (Warman v. Philips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241