Warmack v. Director of Revenue

91 S.W.3d 696, 2002 WL 31752200
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 10, 2002
DocketED 80741
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.W.3d 696 (Warmack v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warmack v. Director of Revenue, 91 S.W.3d 696, 2002 WL 31752200 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott S. Warmack appeals the trial court’s order denying his request to set aside the revocation of his driving privileges. He argues the order is unsupported by substantial evidence and is contrary to the statutory mandate of section 577.041 RSMo 2000. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Chrysler Corp.
91 S.W.3d 696 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.W.3d 696, 2002 WL 31752200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warmack-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2002.