Warma v. State

1931 OK CR 168, 297 P. 821, 50 Okla. Crim. 328, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 4, 1931
DocketNo. A-7727.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1931 OK CR 168 (Warma v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warma v. State, 1931 OK CR 168, 297 P. 821, 50 Okla. Crim. 328, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

*329 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $400 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of five months.

The affidavit was made and the search warrant issued and served on Sunday, the 25th day of August, 1929. No showing was made in the affidavit for the search warrant of an apprehended breach of the peace, or breach of the peace, which would authorize the issuance and service of the writ on Sunday.

In Laub v. State, 49 Okla. Cr. 171, 292 Pac. 891, this court had this question under consideration, and there held the issuance and service of a search warrant on Sunday void, and the evidence obtained by a search on Sunday inadmissible, where no> showing of a breach of the peace, or apprehended breach of the peace, was made to bring it within the exceptions of section 1827, C. O. S. 1921.

For the reason stated, the cause is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Childers
54 Misc. 2d 752 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK CR 168, 297 P. 821, 50 Okla. Crim. 328, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warma-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.