Waring v. Greater Portland Public Development Commission

510 A.2d 1068, 1986 Me. LEXIS 815
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJune 18, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 A.2d 1068 (Waring v. Greater Portland Public Development Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waring v. Greater Portland Public Development Commission, 510 A.2d 1068, 1986 Me. LEXIS 815 (Me. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The defendant, Greater Portland Public Development Commission [GPPDC], appeals from the denial of its motion to set aside an entry of default and the resulting default judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) entered in favor of the plaintiff, Robert W. Waring. On appeal GPPDC challenges the denial of its motion to set aside entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(c) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the record does not demonstrate either a good excuse for the failure to answer prior to entry of default or a meritorious defense to the action, we affirm the judgment. See Michaud v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Ins. Co., 505 A.2d 786, 790-91 (Me.1986).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burns v. Westfield Inn
543 A.2d 836 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 A.2d 1068, 1986 Me. LEXIS 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waring-v-greater-portland-public-development-commission-me-1986.