Waring v. Ayres

12 Abb. Pr. 112
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Leonard, J.

—The judgment appealed from directs the execu[113]*113tion and delivery of a conveyance, with costs, amounting to $223.17.

The deed has been executed and filed with the clerk, but no undertaking of any kind has been filed.

The plaintiff has issued an execution for the costs, notwithstanding the appeal, and the defendant now moves to stay proceedings thereon.

The appellant must comply with the terms required on an appeal to the Court of Appeals, in order to stay proceedings. An appeal is therefore not effectual, unless an undertaking be filed under section 334, as well as the deed under section 337. This has been neglected. The execution is therefore regular.

The appellant cannot deprive the plaintiff of the security obtained by his execution. Any relief which he obtains will be granted as a favor. He may have an order staying proceedings on the execution when he executes and files an approved undertaking, in conformity with sections 334 and 335.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waring v. Ayres, 12 Abb. Pr. 112 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).

12 Abb. Pr. 112 (Waring v. Ayres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walz v. Humrich
158 A.D. 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)