Warfield v. Wirt
29 F. Cas. 226, 2 D.C. 102, 2 Cranch 102
This text of 29 F. Cas. 226 (Warfield v. Wirt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Warfield v. Wirt, 29 F. Cas. 226, 2 D.C. 102, 2 Cranch 102 (circtddc 1814).
Opinion
(nem. con.) refused to quash the return, because-the point did not appear upon the return; and they also doubted their jurisdiction to decide the question upon such a motion; or to .quash a return upon any such ground.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 F. Cas. 226, 2 D.C. 102, 2 Cranch 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warfield-v-wirt-circtddc-1814.