Warfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Warfield v. State

109 So. 3d 895, 2013 WL 1317005, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 2013·No. No. 1D12-1455·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Brunson, 369 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla.1979) (“We specifically hold that a felon under eighteen years of age who is sentenced to probation, but who subsequently violates that probation in a manner which justifies its revocation, may be sentenced without benefit of a presentence investigation. We further hold that once a juvenile felon has demonstrated his inability to comply with the conditions of his probation and has consequently had it revoked, a presentence investigation is not required before sentencing on any subsequent felonies he may commit.”).

BENTON, C.J., WOLF, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Brunson, 369 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla.1979) (“We specifically hold that a felon under eighteen years of age who is sentenced to probation, but who subsequently violates that probation in a manner which justifies its revocation, may be sentenced without benefit of a presentence investigation. We further hold that once a juvenile felon has demonstrated his inability to comply with the conditions of his probation and has consequently had it revoked, a presentence investigation is not required before sentencing on any subsequent felonies he may commit.”).

BENTON, C.J., WOLF, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Warfield v. State, 109 So. 3d 895, 2013 WL 1317005, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

109 So. 3d 895 (Warfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related