Warfield v. State

109 So. 3d 895, 2013 WL 1317005, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-1455
StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 3d 895 (Warfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warfield v. State, 109 So. 3d 895, 2013 WL 1317005, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Brunson, 369 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla.1979) (“We specifically hold that a felon under eighteen years of age who is sentenced to probation, but who subsequently violates that probation in a manner which justifies its revocation, may be sentenced without benefit of a presentence investigation. We further hold that once a juvenile felon has demonstrated his inability to comply with the conditions of his probation and has consequently had it revoked, a presentence investigation is not required before sentencing on any subsequent felonies he may commit.”).

BENTON, C.J., WOLF, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brunson
369 So. 2d 945 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 So. 3d 895, 2013 WL 1317005, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warfield-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.