Warfield v. State
34 Ala. 261
Opinion
There a clerical mistake in entering the judgment in this case. It should have been entered in the name of the State for the use of Mobile county. Code, § 8619.
This mistake being clerical, and amendable in the court below, without resort to any thing outside of the record and the public statutes, furnishes no cause for reversing the judgment of the city court, unless that court had first refused to make the amendment. — Code, § 2401.
The judgment of the city court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warfield v. State, 34 Ala. 261 (Ala. 1859).
34 Ala. 261 (Warfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sherry v. Priest
57 Ala. 410 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Johnson v. Reynolds
44 Ala. 586 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1870)
Jean v. Sandiford
39 Ala. 317 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1864)