Warf v. State
Opinion
Appellant was convicted in the district court of Bexar county of rape, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary. The record is before us without any bills of exception. No brief appears for appellant. The facts support the conclusion of the jury. A girl under the age of consent testified positively to the fact of appellant’s repeated intercourse with her. A physician who examined her testified to corroborative facts. Three special charges were requested, but nothing in the record indicates either of them was presented to the court at the proper time, or that any exception was reserved to the refusal of the court to give them. Exceptions to the main charge also appear, but the matter contained therein does not appear to be erroneous. The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
271 S.W. 1118 (Warf v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.