Warens v. State
931 So. 2d 964, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7729, 2006 WL 1328873
Opinion
The defendant was tried by jury and convicted of aggravated fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer. We affirm his judgment of conviction and sentence, finding no fundamental error in the jury instructions given in this case. We further find no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statement, [965]*965because the Miranda warnings given to the defendant in Spanish were identical to those we found to be adequate in Canete v. State, 921 So.2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warens v. State, 931 So. 2d 964, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7729, 2006 WL 1328873 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
931 So. 2d 964 (Warens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Canete v. State
921 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)