Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Warens v. State

Warens v. State

931 So. 2d 964, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7729, 2006 WL 1328873
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 2006
DocketNo. 4D04-419
StatusPublished

This text of 931 So. 2d 964 (Warens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warens v. State, 931 So. 2d 964, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7729, 2006 WL 1328873 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was tried by jury and convicted of aggravated fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer. We affirm his judgment of conviction and sentence, finding no fundamental error in the jury instructions given in this case. We further find no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statement, [965]*965because the Miranda warnings given to the defendant in Spanish were identical to those we found to be adequate in Canete v. State, 921 So.2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

GUNTHER, FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canete v. State
921 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
931 So. 2d 964, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7729, 2006 WL 1328873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warens-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.