Warenback v. 8th Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Douglas Harry Warenback, Case No.: 2:22-cv-01342-JAD-DJA

4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and 5 v. Recommendation

6 Aaron Ford, Attorney General for the State of [ECF No. 11] Nevada, 7 Defendant 8

9 The magistrate judge screened the plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, 10 dismissed it as deficient, and gave the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint by April 24, 2023.1 11 The plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this case be 12 dismissed and closed.2 That deadline to amend the complaint passed without any action by the 13 plaintiff, and the magistrate judge now recommends that this case be dismissed because there are 14 no pending claims.3 “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 15 unless objections are filed.”4 Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause 16 to adopt it, and I do. 17 18 19

20 1 ECF No. 10. 21 2 Id. 3 ECF No. 11. 22 4 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 23 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 11] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. : mm oA) 5 U.S. District Judge Jennif . Dorsey May 25, 2023 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23