Warehouse Home Furnishings Distributors, Inc. v. Davenport

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Warehouse Home Furnishings Distributors, Inc. v. Davenport

417 S.E.2d 740, 203 Ga. App. 341, 61 Fulton County D. Rep. 17, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 409

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 12, 1992

DocketA90A2107

StatusPublished

This text of 417 S.E.2d 740 (Warehouse Home Furnishings Distributors, Inc. v. Davenport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warehouse Home Furnishings Distributors, Inc. v. Davenport, 417 S.E.2d 740, 203 Ga. App. 341, 61 Fulton County D. Rep. 17, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 409 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Chief Judge.

In Warehouse Home Furnishings Distributors v. Davenport, 261 Ga. 853 (413 SE2d 195) (1992), the Supreme Court limited the scope of its prior decision in Blanton v. Blanton, 259 Ga. 622 (385 SE2d 672) (1989) and reversed our judgment in this case, 199 Ga. App. 33 (403 SE2d 850) (1991), which relied on the interpretation of OCGA § 9-11-45 set forth in Blanton. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated and the Supreme Court’s judgment is made the judgment of this Court. The trial court’s judgment is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion and that of the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

McMurray, P. J., and Carley, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Chief Judge.

In Warehouse Home Furnishings Distributors v. Davenport, 261 Ga. 853 (413 SE2d 195) (1992), the Supreme Court limited the scope of its prior decision in Blanton v. Blanton, 259 Ga. 622 (385 SE2d 672) (1989) and reversed our judgment in this case, 199 Ga. App. 33 (403 SE2d 850) (1991), which relied on the interpretation of OCGA § 9-11-45 set forth in Blanton. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated and the Supreme Court’s judgment is made the judgment of this Court. The trial court’s judgment is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion and that of the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

McMurray, P. J., and Carley, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 S.E.2d 740, 203 Ga. App. 341, 61 Fulton County D. Rep. 17, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warehouse-home-furnishings-distributors-inc-v-davenport-gactapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack