Warehime Enterprises, Inc. v. Warehime
731 A.2d 128
This text of 731 A.2d 128 (Warehime Enterprises, Inc. v. Warehime) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Warehime Enterprises, Inc. v. Warehime, 731 A.2d 128 (Pa. 1999).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of June, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following two issues:
Did the Superior Court err in concluding that the Petitioner failed to state a cause [129]*129of action against Respondent John Ware-hime for breach of fiduciary duty and/or breach of the duty of loyalty and good faith owed to the Petitioner by each of its directors?
Whether 15 Pa.C.S. § 1728 defines the outer limits of a director’s fiduciary duties of care, good faith and/or loyalty in connection with an interested transaction which the director knows will result in unfairness or fraud to the corporation?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harold C. Lampe, Jr V.
665 F.3d 506 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
731 A.2d 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warehime-enterprises-inc-v-warehime-pa-1999.