Wareham v. Wareham

34 A.D.2d 647, 309 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5187
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 6, 1970·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a support proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered June 10, 1969, which denied appellant’s motion for a rehearing of the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. The prior order dated September 27, 1967 is binding as to all matters that were litigated or should have been litigated. Since the matter now alleged does not fall into the category of newly discovered evidence, it was proper to deny a reopening of the issues inherently decided under the order of September 27, 1967 (Statter v. Statter, 2 N Y 2d 668; Matter of Merritt v. Merritt, 259 App. Div. 242, app. dsmd. 285 N. Y. 561). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wareham v. Wareham, 34 A.D.2d 647, 309 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

34 A.D.2d 647 (Wareham v. Wareham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bolotnikov v. Bolotnikov
262 A.D.2d 318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Shapiro v. Shapiro
151 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Neita W. v. Canute W.
114 Misc. 2d 981 (New York Family Court, 1981)